3086

American Western Painting, possibly an unfinished CM Russell, c1912 [182788]

Currency:USD Category:Collectibles Start Price:20,000.00 USD Estimated At:50,000.00 - 200,000.00 USD
American Western Painting, possibly an unfinished CM Russell, c1912 [182788]
SOLD
25,500.00USD+ (6,375.00) buyer's premium + applicable fees & taxes.
This item SOLD at 2024 Aug 24 @ 08:56UTC-7 : PDT/MST
UNCLAIMED MERCHANDISE: In the event that a successful bidder has paid in full for their merchandise but fails to settle outstanding shipping invoices or make arrangements for merchandise pickup within 60 days, HWAC reserves the right to declare the merchandise forfeited. This forfeiture will result in the merchandise becoming the property of HWAC and the successful bidder shall have no claim to or rights over the forfeited merchandise.
American Western Painting, Possibly an Unfinished CM Russell, c1912-1914
Copyright Fred N. Holabird, 2024
Introduction
A highly skilled beautiful western painting of Indians was brought to us lately by a major collector’s Nevada family. It has no signature, has a number of identifying characteristics both in the image itself, and on the canvas back as well as the original wood frame supporting the canvas. We began a lengthy investigative period of about six months looking into the various factual clues which form partial provenance, including detailed Xrays. This report summarizes our research.
The Painting
A stunning, detailed bright and vibrant depiction of Indians on the trail. It is unsigned with an outside framed size of 27.5 x 31” and a canvas on its original wood frame inside the frame of the approximate size 19.5 x 23.75”.
On the back of the painting the canvas manufacturer mark is present: “Chenil by the town hall, Chlesea.” This specific trademark can be dated by published reports as 1911-1912.[1]

Specifically, this logo was only used during the 1911-1912 period as seen by the dates of known paintings: George Bell, Lulworth Cove, 1911. William Orpen, The Chinese Shawl, 1912. Unknown, Mother and Child Circa 1910.
According to the National Portrait Gallery, Charles Chenil & Co Ltd were “colourmen, brush manufacturers, and picture dealers” in London. The Chenil Gallery in London was founded in 1905 and closed in 1927. We did not investigate the marketing efforts of Chenil & Co., who may have been a major international source of framed canvas at the time.

An additional piece of paper on the back of the frame reads “Maples Depository.” Maples Depository was a long-existing “storage” facility/warehouse in London. The Depository appears to have opened in early 1894 and closed about 1956. Maples depository sold goods through Bonham & Sons at 65 Oxford St. W. in London, who were the major antique auction house since 1793.[2] It is thus apparent that this fine painting resided in this facility for an unknown period of time and was probably sold because the storage fee was unpaid and the item among one or more pieces “abandoned” by an unknown party. Unfortunately, no date accompanies the Maples Depository sticker.

A letter in copy form dated July 7, 1965 signed by Paul Curtis that was attached to the back of the painting describes the painting as follows:

“Warpath”, attributed to Charles Marion Russell, American; 1865-1929, oil on canvas, 24 x 19 ½, (unsigned). … During one period in Russell’s life, he fell into the habit of nor signing his work. It is possible your painting comes from this period, or was painted by a close follower of Russell. In any case, it is a commendable work of art in its own right. …

The Curtis letter does not contain an address nor the client name, but does render an appraised value of $12,000. Paul Curtis was an accomplished British artist. He received his first art degree from the noteworthy Bournville College of Art in Birmingham before receiving a Master’s degree from the very prestigious and exclusive Royal Academy of Arts in London.[3] The fact that Mr. Curtis rendered an opinion on this painting strongly suggests the painting was in England in 1965.

At some point this painting came into the possession of a major collector residing in Nevada and did not see the public light of day until now. An 8 x 10 color transparency was professionally made and sent to an art collector specializing in Charles Russell paintings, as well as other materials.

Estimate $100,000 - $200,000


Synopsis[4]
An essay by Fred N. Holabird
Actual factual information of this painting is unknown except that it was held in the Maples Depository storage facility in London, as noted by a sticker on the back. Between then, presumably about 1914 and about thirty years ago, the whereabouts of the painting are unknown.
Using the Maples Depository as a starting point, knowing the painting must have resided there perhaps until the painting was sold as abandoned or the warehouse’s closure in about 1956, it makes perfect sense to look at the life of Charles Russell. There simply is no other reason for a western style painting of this professionality and genre to be in London at a storage facility. The painting is very much in his style. There are similarities that are not necessarily apparent in other western artists work. Examples of these eccentricities perhaps start at the dust clouds behind the running horses. These dust clouds are murky brown hues completely without detail, exactly as a normal desert dust cloud behind a running horse appears. When we looked at the dust clouds on this painting, it had the impression of an unfinished area. But upon close inspection of a number of Russell’s paintings, this dust cloud is virtually identical to others. Examples include ”Smoking Them Out”, “Fighting Meat”, “Mexico,” “Cowboys from the Quarter Circle Box,” “Lassoing a Steer,” “The Renegade,” “When Sioux and Blackfeet Meet,” and others that he painted.
Russell also had a habit of de-emphasizing human figures in the background, leaving out facial details and others, helping to bring focus to the viewer of the upfront action, thus drawing the viewer into the action itself.
Russell’s Background
Russell’s career started in the 1880s. During his lengthy painting period which spanned his entire life, Russell is credited with over two thousand oil paintings. The CM Russell Museum has been accumulating information on his paintings for years, under their Catalog Raisonne project, which is ongoing, incomplete, and not available to the public. 278 canvases are shown on the Russell Wikipedia site and 293 on a You Tube channel without identification. The Russell Museum has a large collection, but a list is not available to the public.[5]
Russel was always asked to comment on his life and work:
I just naturally painted all my life … I guess I am more of an illustrator than an artist, but I have lived the real ranch life, so know how to paint it … The trouble is that the west is so big it cant be expressed in painting or anything else.[6]
Russell’s First International Exhibition: Calgary, Alberta
Russel painted for over twenty years before he broke out into the international spotlight. His wife Nancy was behind the effort to get her husband’s work known internationally. In 1912, she arranged for a show at the Calgary Stampede. For those not familiar with Calgary, it is the bullseye of “cowboy” country in Canada. Located centrally in Alberta just above the American border, it is only about 300 miles north of Great Falls, Russell’s lifelong home in Montana. It was here in Calgary that Russell’s international reputation and demand for his paintings took off.
The Calgary Stampede management was so excited to have the Russell exhibit that publicity started in July, 1912. A list of twenty of Russell’s paintings was published: Trouble Hunters, Heads and Tails, Marais River, Dangerous, Plunger, The Bell Mare, Peigans, Smoke of a 45, At Rope’s End, The Wagon Boss, Hoss Flesh Comes High, In Without Knocking, After the Chase, The Hunting Party, A Disputed Trail, Scouts, Rainy Morning, Mandan Dance, Moving Camp, and Call of the Dawn. It was also mentioned that he had several water colors and planned to bring some bronzes, though this was never confirmed.[7] The exhibit was set for September 2, 3 , 4, 5 of 1912.
Planning for the exhibit was a pleasant distraction from the horrors of the international tragedy of the sinking of the Titanic in April. The Calgary Stampede attracted hundreds of international visitors, particularly those from England. Relatives of many attendees were lost at sea and had the horrific event on their minds, and Russell’s work helped deflect unhappy thoughts.[8]
Interest and anticipation in Russell’s exhibition grew as the Stampede grew closer.
Only four more days and the big show is on,” … “Each day sees the excitement becoming more acute … in anticipation of the greatest event not only of Canada but of its kind that has ever been held on the American Continent.[9]
On opening day the Calgary Albertan gave the Russell exhibit an overwhelmingly positive review. The exhibit was entitled “The Last and Best West.” A local art critic took notice:
Though still a young man, Mr. Russell is rapidly achieving an international reputation through his portrayal of western types such as the real western Indian … Twenty years ago, Mr. Russell was a cowboy in Montana and it is from actual contact with life … that he obtains material for his pictures … Admittedly, he is a genius, but in Mr. Russell’s case the remark of the philosopher that “genius is an infinite capacity for taking pains” is given an exceptional illustration.[10]
The four day show got off to a tremendous start, as one man bought four of the paintings right away on the first day. Henry M. Pellatt of Toronto purchased Heads and Tails, Hoss Flesh Comes High, In Without Knocking, and Scouts. [11] Other paintings were sold to British customers who took them home “to decorate several ancestral halls of England.”[12] Another of the paintings, “Smoke of the 45” was sold later in Chiago by Thurber’s.[13] Other Russell paintings were sold to Edward Grenfell, of London bankers Morgan-Grenfell, who came over from London for the exhibit. Regardless of sales, the exhibit remained intact throughout its completion.[14]
The exhibit was such a success that arrangements were made for it to continue through the week of September 9. By then, fourteen of his original 20 paintings had sold. Visitors from London were so impressed and overwhelmed that they made an offer to Russel to display his works there. Nancy Russel remarked:
Whether Mr. Russell accepts it in the near future, however, depends on the pictures that he has available for exhibit. Practically all of his best pictures have been disposed of, and unless some arrangement could be made for the exhibition of these, we would not care to exhibit in London until Mr. Russell has produced more work with which to make a larger showing than would be possible with those now on hand.[15]
In short, it appeared he was down to less than ten paintings to sell. He needed more time to paint more.

London
In the first couple of decades of the twentieth century, the Dore Gallery on Bond Street in London was arguably the most popular art gallery in this international city that was the center of the English speaking world. An English art critic noted:
In obtaining space in the Dore Galleries for the exhibit of his paintings, the “Cowboy Artist” made a ten strike, as these galleries are among the most famous in England.[16]
The gallery regularly featured exhibits from artists around the world, as well as obtaining some works on loan from other museums. They also held lectures in the evenings, sometimes as often as once a week on all topics related to art.[17]
The Dore Gallery was the obvious choice for a Russell Exhibit, and the Gallery devoted an entire room to Russell. Plans were made probably in 1913 for the exhibit, though news of the exhibit did not begin until March, 1914. The exhibit was first publicized in Montana.
The show was scheduled for the entire month of April, 1914.[18] The Dore does not appear to have used newspaper advertising until April 2, but as with any popular gallery, they may have had large posters in and about the Gallery for the month before the actual event.[19]
Back in Montana, the local papers suggested the Russells would be abroad for three or four months.[20] They took “about 25 pictures,” though only nine were ever listed in articles: Marias River, When Sioux and Blackfeet Meet, Going to Camp, The West That Has Passed, Wild Horse Hunters, A Dangerous Cripple, The Queen’s War Hounds, Jerkline, and Whiskey Peddler.” “Smoke of the 45” was also in the exhibit, though never listed in print.[21] They also added “an unknown Indian picture.”[22]
The Montana papers published notes of his trip to New York on the way to London. Russell had left Montana on March 3, traveled to St. Paul to visit family, then on to Chicago, arriving March 8. While there, it was announced he had 25 canvases of western Life on view.
The London Evening Standard had a regular art critic, who published his reviews regularly on the exhibits at the Dore. His work was always singed “C.M”. Russell’s exhibit, “The West Has Passed” occupied a full gallery room, and other temporary exhibits included John Duncan Ferguson and impressionist paintings by Fred S. Corday.[23] “C.M.” reviewed Ferguson’s works on February 27. His five paragraph review of Ferguson suggests he was a true art lover.[24] C.M.’s review of the Russell exhibit is certainly of note. It is highly probable that no other western cowboy artist ever exhibited in London, so it was probably a “first” for not only C.M., but for all Londoners. As CM stated:
Mr. Russell has been a real Cowboy, and he is a real artist, and the combination is highly satisfactory.
CM further noted that interest in the exhibit was high.
The interest being so much in the subjects, only a very pedantic person could look at such an exhibition of pictures from a technical point of view; but it may be said at once that Mr. Russell is a good draughtsman and colourist, with more skill than is immediately obvious in the arrangement of a subject, and great power of suggestive movement. … They are painted with great spirit and convincingness.[25]
A competing review published by an unnamed art critic in the London Observer was not impressed, suggesting this style of art was so new to him that he could not contemplate it in a forthright sense. It also shows a complete lack of knowledge of the American West as a whole.[26]
His scenes of bear hunting, wild horse chase and strife between outlaws and the upholders of official authority, as well as between whites and redskins, are full of movement and dramatic excitement; and it would be foolish to question his knowledge of equine anatomy. But his paint has no quality, and is not constructive. The colour is not an integral part of the conception; it is a mere afterthought.[27]
Within just av few days, the Dore was advertising Russell’s work as “Great Masterpieces.” Clearly, the public was impressed.[28]
Meanwhile, back in Montana, news articles discussed the London exhibit, noting with passion that the last painting in the exhibit was a “favorite of the artist himself”, “showing the lassoing of horses up in the mountains.”[29]
As the month of April grew to a close, the exhibit remained popular. The art world in London remained as normal, and as new exhibits occupied galleries at the Dore, the art critic CM continued to publish detailed and inciteful reviews.[30] While reviewers mention a “catalog” of some of the exhibits, particularly the “Futurism” exhibit, no reference was ever made to any catalog regarding the Russell exhibit.[31] Indeed, the exhibit was only planned for the month of April, and its popularity caused it to run into June, with interest at a high level unknown to the management until the exhibit had been in place for nearly a month.
The Russells had planned on returning to Montana after the planned exhibit closure at the end of April. Their pre-scheduled trip on the Lusitania from London to New York left May 9th, and they did not miss it. It is a surety that the sinking of the Titanic was on their minds, something that was so prevalent in the news when they were first discussing and planning the London trip back in 1912.
Toward the end of the Exhibition at the Dore, discussions were made for the possibility of a continued and great exhibit at the Anglo-American Exposition which was to open May 10 and run for six months. While Russell’s participation was announced with surety in the Montana press, it was not necessarily a sure thing.[32]
The Dore continued to advertise the Russell exhibit in London newspapers. The last advertisement was on June 3, 1914. [33]
That same day, tragedy struck at the Dore. A series of three attacks by “Suffragettes” took place in London, and one was at the Dore Gallery. In a neighboring exhibition hall near the Russel gallery, Suffragist Ivy Bon took an axe to two works of art. She brutally slashed Bartolozzi’s “Love Wounded,” which was completely destroyed, and John Shapland’s “Grand Canal at Venice,” which was somewhat restored later. The woman was taken into custody by the Dore staff, and later arrested by Police. Bon left a note on a chair near the destroyed works:
To stop this, you must give us justice. We are willing to die for it before we give in. We have tried all other ways. We have been too ladylike in the past. Now we are going to fight, and you can allow us to be killed; others will rise and take our place. I have joined the war.[34]
The attack was probably relayed to the Russells in America by telegraph. It would have put an immediate stop to any exhibits planned or unplanned in London. On June 7, the Great Falls Tribune reported on the end of the exhibits without reference to the attacks, which notice was “clearly between the lines.”
In an interview with Mrs. Russell, she stated the “purpose of the trip was to establish the Montana artist among the world’s greatest painters.” … “the trip was an unqualified success.” The article further commented on not exhibiting at the Anglo-American Expo:
This remarkable offer was the direct result of the sensation which the paintings had caused among art lovers in London, but it was declined, owing to the fact that Mr. and Mrs. Rusell did not wish to move the paintings from the Dore gallery in Bond Street.[35]
The quote is a perfect political response to an otherwise terrible series of events of which the American audience was unaware.
The attack at the Dore by a Suffragette was devastating to both the Gallery and Russells, not to mention the two artists whose work was destroyed. Bon and her cohorts were a radical sect of sorts of the international “Suffragette” movement. If the world had mass media at that point, Bon and her compatriots would have known that back home in Montana, the Montana Suffragettes considered Russell as their Hero. Just a few months prior, Montana had celebrated Charles Russell Day, with one of the women (Suffragettes), Mrs. S.D. Largen, delivering a lecture on the life of Charles Russell.[36]
The destruction didn’t stop with Bon. Two days later on June 5, a bronze statue called “Wounded Swallow” was stolen from the Dore by Charles Barge. He pawned it down the street and was caught.[37]
A few days later on June 9, Bon was sentenced to six months in prison. She remained defiant to the end, shouting “Torturers! Murderers! I don’t care if you sentence me to death. I will do it again and again until we get justice.”[38]
In Montana, newspapers were still publishing through mid-June that the Russell Exhibit at the Anglo-American Exposition, but that news was incorrect.[39]
Interestingly, Nancy Russell did not mention any of the June, 1914 trouble, or sales of Charlie’s paintings in her memoirs.[40]
The Aftermath
Little is known of the closure process at the Dore Gallery of the Russell Exhibit. While it was stated that three of the paintings had sold and options were placed on five others, it is unknown exactly what sold or remained in London. The Russells had left for Montana, and after the destruction of two paintings and a theft of a Bronze, it is probable that the Russell exhibit was closed permanently.
The full list of the paintings in the exhibit was never published. Further research into Russell’s correspondence may render a complete, or at least a more complete list of the paintings, perhaps inclusive of those left behind, some of which may have been “optioned.”
What paintings remained in England, and which were shipped home remain a mystery, except one canvas which was later sold in Chicago in 1915 as noted earlier.
This Painting
The entire essay above is a necessity because the question begged: “Why would this American West painting be sitting in the Maples Depository warehouse in London for so long?” The only reasonable answer is that, as a painting of the American West, who was or could have been exhibiting paintings such as this? The only answer is Charles M. Russell.
Painting Content
The content of the painting was discussed above, and more notes could be applied, and have been by at least one highly qualified expert on Russell who has seen the large color transparency of this current painting presented him in detail. This collector, who has perhaps more current experience with Russell’s work than any man alive, asked us for xrays of the painting, which we acquired on June 16 at a local laboratory by permission, performed by professionals.
Xrays were taken of each quadrant, thus four in total. All show significant detail. Interpretation of the xrays can be difficult, as it can be with any subject inclusive of human anatomy. There are, perhaps, two striking possible anomalies. One is the apparent overpainting of another horse to the immediate left of the primary horse. Here, light brown hues were used to bring out the dirt dust that would be normally seen behind a running horse. This “dust” (dirt) over-painted the legs of another horse. A second possible anomaly lies immediately left of the over-painted horse legs. There, a possible Indian figure appears behind the central and main Indian figure. It is over-painted with a much smaller Indian in the background distance. There are a few other possible anomalies in other places, but the thing that stands out the most are that legs of another horse that appear to be present under the current oil paints that created a “dust” effect behind the main horse.
The xrays confirm the original presence of specific attributes that Russell used with Indians and their horses throughout his “catalog” of work.
Does this mean that the painting was unfinished, with the artist not pleased with the current rendering? Perhaps so…
Other Questions Arise
Was this painting finished in the eyes of the artist? Is that why it is unsigned?
Was the Chenil canvas purchased in London or in the USA? The Chenil hallmarked canvas was sold by Chenil & Co. Ltd. The original company was the Chenil Gallery, which opened in 1903 on King’s Road in Chelsea. The Chenil & Co. business was a spinoff in 1905 selling artists materials. They converted to a public company in the early 1920’s only to voluntarily close in 1927. It is unknown how much of their business was created from their own manufacture of artists’ supplies, such as framed canvases. Artists canvas is very simply a simple plain woven cotton, and London canvas and cloth manufacturers were among the largest in the world in the nineteenth century, supplying much of America until the industrial revolution of the post 1880s years. Chenil also sold other canvas supplier’s goods, such as Winsor & Newton, Ltd., another major artists’ canvas supplier. Was Chenil an exporter of supplies to the USA? It is very difficult to find artist supply advertisements from the circa 1910-1920 period in the USA.[41] The Chenil canvases, however, appear to be well circulated among British artists. The British National Portrait Gallery site for British Art Suppliers (1650-1950) lists more than twenty paintings with Chenil hallmarks. While no USA works are cited, it must be noted that the study is for British art.[42]
Russell was known to take art supplies with him on journeys. Did he buy a canvas in London and start a painting? Did he buy the canvas in the USA and take it to London, unfinished? Even though the framed blank canvas dates to 1911-1912, it is impossible to know when the oil was applied by the artist.
Was it a painting made just prior to the Dore exhibition, but never completed to the satisfaction of the artist? Mrs. Russell had noted that they needed more works to be created in order to have enough for the London exhibit after selling most of the available Russell art at the Calgary Exhibit. This only left about 14 months for Russell to make new paintings.
Was it a Russell painting that was “optioned” in London and never delivered?
If the painting was begun, or ended up in London indefinitely, it would never have been known to Russell archivist Frederic G. Renner, who spent years accumulating information on Russell paintings.[43]
If the painting was begun in the USA, was a British tariff involved, potentially preventing its return? Was a USA tariff involved if it came back into the USA?[44]
Was it sitting in the London warehouse, paid for to the artist, but waiting for payment for shipping or storage from the new owner, who may have forgotten, died, or some other possibility? In our own auction house, we see this very scenario over and over again.
Did a copyist paint it while the Russell exhibit was ongoing in London? I doubt it, since this appears to be a much more modern practice. Examples of Russell “copyists” exist, but are later in date, generally after Russell’s death in 1929. One such example was Franz Trevors who was commissioned to paint about seven very large canvas copies of Russell’s work for two Nevada Casinos at the end of, and just after, World War 2. Each of these works has a specific peculiarity that differs from an original Russell, though the resemblance is striking.

Summary
This painting appears to have all the attributes to suggest it is an original Charles M. Russell, though perhaps is unfinished. There does not appear to be any alternate explanation of the painting residing in London for some time, which is critical to the entire story of its existence. As an advanced art work that sat unknown in a London storage facility until approximately 1965, then purchased by a collector where it sat for decades until after his death, it was completely unknown to the formal art world until now.
Send your experts.



[1] See: https://www.npg.org.uk/assets/files/pdf/research/D.marks2_A_D.pdf https://www.royalacademy.org.uk/art-artists/organisation/charles-chenil-and-co-ltd-london https://issuu.com/jammdesign/docs/dw_8march23_art
[2] Maples depository’s first advertisement was found in February, 1894, and the last one in 1956. They very rarely advertised, perhaps leaving that up to the seller, Bonham & Sons.
[3]It appears this opinion letter was written just after completion of his Master’s degree. The exact date of completion of the Master’s degree is unknown. Mr. Curtis may still be alive, though possibly well over 80. The Royal Academy of Art only accepts 10-17 graduate students per year for a full time three year Master’s degree – an exceptionally high quality education in the arts. He went on to teach for over 30 years at Sheffield Hallam University, about 190 miles north of London.
[4] More research is needed through a thorough study of the Russell papers and correspondence held at several depositories. Such an undertaking is beyond the scope of this essay.
[5] Personal Communication, July 18, 2024.
[6] Great Falls Ledger, 3/10/1914, p5, “Hop Meets Chas. Russell”
[7] Calgary Herald, 7/26/1912, p5. “Valuable Paintings will be Exhibited”
[8] Calgary Herald, 7/26/12, “Titanic Survivors Aided by red Cross.”
[9] Calgary Herald, 8/27/1912 p 16. “Interest intense”
[10] Calgary Albertan, 9/2/1912, p1, “Charles Russell, Cowboy Artist, Comes to Calgary”
[11] Calgary Herald, 9/7/1912 p 24, untitled
[12] Anaconda Standard, 3/4/1914, p8, “Russell Going to London to Exhibit His Art Works.”
[13] Great Falls Leader, 3/10/1914, p5, “Hop Meets Chas. Russell”
[14] Edward Grenfell was a senior partner with J.P. Morgan in Morgan-Grenfell, one of the largest banking firms in the western world. Grenfell, as well as his partner J. P. Morgan, along with other mega wealthy businessmen such as J. D. Rockefeller and W. A. Clark also were avid art collectors. Grenfell personally, and his bank, were major contributors to the Titanic Relief Fund.
[15] Calgary Albertan, 9/9/1912, p11, “Russell Exhibit to Be Continued This Week”
[16] Great Falls Tribune, 6/7/1914, p13, “Britons Enraptured by Russell’s Art”
[17] The London papers had regular columns of current art exhibits. The Dore Gallery was always at the top of the lists of galleries, giving the impression that it was the most prominent. One such lecture took place during the Russell exhibit, on the evening of April 29. London Times, 4/29/1914, p25, “Lectures, Etc.”
[18] The Anaconda Standard, 3/4/1914, “Russell Going to London to Exhibit His Art Works”
[19] Daily Telegraph, London, 4/2/1914, p1. The first advertisement appears on April 2. Internal advertising could not be found in online records of the Dore Gallery, inclusive of a “catalog” of Russell’s exhibit.
[20] Great Falls Tribune, 3/4/1914, p6, “Artist Russell and Wife Off to London”
[21] This painting sold in 1915 in Chicago, by Thurber’s. Great Falls Tribune, 3/8/1915, p8, “Cowbell rings Russell tribute.”
[22] Anaconda Standard, 3/4/1914, p8, Russell Going to London to Exhibit His Art Works”; Billings Daily Tribune, 6/18/1914, p4, “Russell Returns From London”
[23] Ferguson painted nudes. Corday was a “fellow worker” of Renoir and Pissarro (London Observer, 4/12/1914, p5, “The Dore Gallery”
[24] London Evening Standard, 2/27/1914, p8, “Art Exhibitions”
[25] London Evening Standard, 4/7/1914, p8, “The cowboy Artist.”
[26] The lack of knowledge of the American West was omnipresent in the art world. They even scoffed at Albert Bierstadt’s paintings as fantasy. Those of us who have lived our lives here in the American West know Bierstadt’s work well, and regularly call our magnificent mountain sunsets “Bierstadt sunsets.” (fh)
[27] London Observer, 4/1/1914, p5, “The Dore Gallery”, unsigned.
[28] London Times, 4/13/1914, p 1, “Dore’s Great Masterpieces”
[29] Great Falls Leader, 4/23/1914, p8, “London Paper Talks of Russell’s Work”. This paper is not available on Newspapers.com. I was unable to determine which specific painting this was. There is no published list or pictorial catalog of all known Russell paintings, as mentioned previously.
[30] London Evening Standard, 5/5/1914, p11, “Futurism”, a review on the new exhibit at the Dore on Italian futurist painters that was opened in a nearby room to the Russell exhibit at the Dore.
[31] London Evening Standard, 5/19/1914, p10. I was unable to find any catalog of the Russell Exhibit in the various Dore internet archives.
[32] Great Falls Tribune, 5/24/ 1914, p4, “Mr. and Mrs. Russell Return to America” and Kalispell Times Monitor, 5/28/1914, p 1, same title and article.
[33] London Daily Telegraph, 6/3/1914, p1, “Futurist Pictures…”
[34] The Guardian, London, 6/4/1914, p7, “Another Art Gallery Outrage”
[35] Great Falls Tribune, 6/7/1914, p1, 11, 13 “Britons Encaptured by Russell’s Aart”; Billings Daily Tribune, 6/18/1914, p4 “Russell Returns from London: Western Paintings Praised by Famous Critics of Continent”
[36] Great Falls Tribune, 3/1/1914
[37] London Evening Standard, 8/1/1914, p16, “Theft From the Dore Gallery” (“Today’s Police Reports”)
[38] London Evening Standard, 6/9/1914, p2, “Dore Gallery Outrage”
[39] Big Sandy Mountaineer, 6/18/1914, pA1, “London’s Tribute to Russell”
[40] Russell, Nancy; Back-Tracking in Memory; The Life of Charles M. Russell; Edited by Thomas Petrie and Brian Dippie, 2021, pp133-139
[41] Unfortunately, newspapers.com and several other online print search engines do not appear to have digitized copies of art publications.
[42] Charles Chenil & Co. Ltd, in British Artist Suppliers, 1650-1950, under the National Portrait Gallery web site, last updated March, 2020, with the site last updated March, 2024. See also Evening London Standard, 11/27/1905, p 13, “Chenil Gallery”
[43] The Renner Library is held at the Russell Museum in Great Falls, MT. See also “Frederic Renner and Charlie Russell SRM Legacy” by Tamra DeCock in the Society for Range Management Journal, October, 2010.
[44] Hamilton Spectator, 1/9/1911, p11, “smuggling Old Masters.” Good discussion of the tariff problem in 1911.

The Saga Continues … Russell (or who?) After Remington …
An outstanding observation was made by another western art fan who presented this Frederic Remington painting from 1908 now residing in the Frederic Remington Museum. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that our questioned painting is based upon this Remington painting, entitled “The Snow Trail.” The subject matter and composition is quite simply far too similar, though the quality of the questioned piece appears far better, and has far more detail.
Remington and Russell had very similar formats, inclusive of dust trails behind horses.
The question begs: Just who is copying who? Is this actually a better version of the Snow Trail, painted by Remington? (no – you’ll read later.)
Nancy Russell never discussed Remington in her biography of her husband.
In 2001, the work and comparison of the pair was explored in an exhibit at the Fred Jones Museum at the University of Oklahoma complete with an important written work by Peter Hassrick in Remington, Russell and the Language of Art (2000). Some interesting notes can be observed from this work.
Remington was a nearly full-time illustrator through 1908, when he closed that chapter of his life in favor of oil on canvas representations of the West. It was at that point that Remington began painting full time, and this canvas, The Snow Trail, may be one of his efforts of that period, if the date is correct from internet sources. The work is curiously not listed in Hassrick’s discussion of paintings, which may simply mean the painting was not on display in that exhibit.
Remington died in December, 1909. The questioned painting was done after 1911-1912. Is this a copy by Russell of a Remington? Was another artist as polished as Russell, and created this painting?
We will probably never know.
Please see last photo.